When proofs are updated in the Digital Twin, how should a Digital Representative explain the change to users and preserve credibility?

A Digital Representative should surface a transparent provenance panel that explains why proofs changed, including dates and the specific proofs added or replaced. Show a concise note like: ‘Evidence updated on DATE; sources [A,B] replaced/augmented with [C].’ Attach a versioned history tied to the canonical fact IDs so users can compare current outputs with earlier ones. Maintain an auditable Change Log and keep private procedures in the Operational layer. By presenting clear provenance and version history, the Digital Representative preserves trust even as the underlying proofs evolve.